
In
August, I shared
about the
developing
situation with
Gordon College and
the New England
Association of
Schools and
Colleges (NEACS)
regarding the
school’s need to
either embrace the
new
Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender
(LGTS) agenda or
lose their
accreditation.
Since that
time, more
information has
surfaced on this
war by anti-Christian
groups to force an
anti-biblical
paradigm change
within Christian
education that
will have
devastating
spiritual
repercussions.
In
a recent article
on OneNewsNow.com,
journalist Michael
F. Haverluck
declared:
Accredited
or not accredited
… that is the
question. Keeping
to its biblical
code of behavior
as a Christian
college since
1889, Gordon
College has now
been given an
ultimatum by the
New England
Association of
Schools and
Colleges (NEASC):
be an accredited
academic
institution by
accepting
“homosexual
practice” or
stick to its
Christian
teachings on
sexual behavior
and be
unaccredited. [1]
Haverluck
goes on to share:
Gordon
College will
be trying to
convince the NEASC
over the next 12
to 18 months
during a review
period that its
policy conforms to
the new thinking
sweeping the
education system
— one that
embraces and
normalizes
homosexual
behavior on
campus.
Prepping
for its September
2015 meeting with
the NEASC, a
“working group
of 20
representative
trustees, faculty,
administrators,
staff and
students” will
prepare and submit
a review of the
process and its
outcomes, which
includes
indoctrinating
campus members in
the “proper”
way to respond to
homosexual
behavior. The
document to be
issued to the
Commission on
Institutions of
Higher Education
must primarily
prove one thing:
“[The
review must]
ensure [Gordon
College’s]
ability to foster
an atmosphere that
respects and
supports people of
diverse
characteristics
and backgrounds,
consistent with
the Commission’s
Standards for
Accreditation,”
reads a joint
statement produced
by the Wenham,
Massachusetts-based
college and the
NEASC.
Scrutiny
of campus
worldviews and
attitudes toward
the LGBTQ
community
escalated fairly
recently after
Gordon College
president D.
Michael Lindsay
signed a letter
along with other
academic and
religious leaders
asking for a
religious
exemption from
President Barack
Obama’s
executive order
that banned
discrimination
based on sexual
orientation.
Repercussions were
immediate, as the
town hall in Salem
quickly canceled
Gordon College’s
contract to use
its facility when
they found out
about Lindsay’s
request.
According
to the NEASC, it
assured Gordon
College that if it
doesn’t alter
its policy, “the
organization
won’t be rushing
to withdraw the
school’s
accreditation;”
however, the NEASC
controls whether
federal funding
will be made
available to the
college.[2]
Dr.
Greg Koukl, who is
the president of
“Stand to
Reason” and
teaches
Apologetics at
Biola University,
has clearly
outlined what is
at stake:
“If
they do not change
the standards for
sexual behavior in
their ‘life and
conduct
statement’
(which prohibit
‘sexual
relations outside
of marriage’ and
‘homosexual
practice’) they
will lose their
accreditation.” [3]
In
the article, Koukl
and Haverluck
brought further
clarity to the
situation at
Gordon College:
Koukl
does not believe
that this
timeframe is as
generous as it’s
been described
when taking the
policy’s roots
into
consideration.
“How
reasonable of the
commission to give
Gordon College 18
months to come to
terms with
overturning the
thousands-of-years-old
Christian view of
acceptable sexual
behavior,” Koukl
jests. “This
18-month reprieve
is nothing but
theater, of
course. Gordon
College will not
convince the
commission their
standards are
‘non-discriminatory.’”
The
Christian scholar,
who also teaches
Apologetics at
Biola University
in La Mirada,
California,
believes Gordon
College is
exercising an act
of futility in its
attempt for
accreditation.
“Gordon
College will
explain the
difference between
behavior and
identity, between
a person with
same-sex
attractions who
agrees with the
biblical standards
and one who
doesn’t, and the
difference between
banning a person
because of his
sexual orientation
and banning
particular
behaviors among
all students that
go against the
biblical view,”
Koukl argues.
“And then the
commission will
reject it.”
Koukl
is quite sure that
this will be the
course of action
taken and explains
why.
“How
do I know this?”
asks the Christian
leader
headquartered in
Signal Hill,
California.
“Because this is
what happened
earlier this year
when Gordon
College publicly
argued for the
‘right of
faith-based
institutions to
set and adhere to
standards which
derive from our
shared framework
of faith.’ That
controversy ended
with the
termination of
their city
contract to
maintain Salem’s
historical Old
Town Hall and
their student
teachers being
removed from
public schools.”
[4]
Believers
may not be aware
of just how
paramount this
case is between
Gordon College and
the NEACS. Gordon
College and Dr.
Lindsay are
standing on the
frontline in an
all-out assault
against
Christianity.
If a
secular agency can
dictate the
religious beliefs
and worldviews of
a Christian
institution of
higher learning,
then religious
freedom in this
nation is over.
Gordon
College may become
the first domino
to fall in the
absolute takeover
of Christian
education and our
pulpits.
If NEACS
and LGBT succeed,
a tsunami of
Christian schools
departing sound
doctrine to
maintain
government funding
will follow.
We may soon
find aspirants of
ministry trained
in the exegesis of
political
correctness rather
than that of
scripture.
The
spiritual, moral,
and (dare I say)
eternal
consequences for
the next
generation are
unfathomable . . .
nearly apocalyptic
from a
conservative,
fundamental
perspective.
Caught
Between a Rock and
a Hard (Apostate)
Place
“There
have been
individuals
embedded within
various
organizations
around the United
States that have
been waiting for
the right
political agenda
to surface that
would empower
their tacit war
against biblical
Christianity.
Accreditation
of Christian
schools will be
one of their chief
weapons,” warned
my mentor in the
1980’s.
Today, Dr.
McLachlan would
seem more like a
prophet than an
educator.
Christian
institutions that
have been involved
in
government-approved
accreditation for
participation in
the Guaranteed
Student Loan
Program (Title IV
Funds) will find
themselves
standing between
the proverbial
rock and a hard
place.
Let me
explain:
1.
If these
accredited schools
refuse to bow to
regional
accreditation’s
demand to rewrite
their biblical
beliefs from a
biblical worldview
to the new LGBT
agenda, they will
lose access to
Title IV funding.
Governmental
accreditation and
Title IV Funding
are inseparable.
Without
students being
able to
participate in the
Guaranteed Student
Loan Program,
enrollments would
plummet and
bankrupt every
school that
refuses to
compromise.
(Checkmate)
2.
If these
accredited schools
succumb to the
demands being
presented by their
accrediting
associations and
LBGT, then they
will fall prey to
the doctrine of
Balaam.
Revelation
2:14-16 (KJV)
14 But
I have a few
things against
thee, because thou
hast there them
that hold the
doctrine of
Balaam, who taught
Balac to cast a
stumblingblock
before the
children of
Israel, to eat
things sacrificed
unto idols, and to
commit
fornication. 15
So
hast thou also
them that hold the
doctrine of the
Nicolaitans, which
thing I hate. 16
Repent;
or else I will
come unto thee
quickly, and will
fight against them
with the sword of
my mouth.
The
Greek word used in
Rev. 2:14 for fornication is porneuo
(porn-yoo'-o),
which means:
1) to
prostitute one's
body to the lust
of another 2) to
give one's self to
unlawful sexual
intercourse. [5]
The
LGBT agenda falls
squarely within
the biblical
definition of
fornication.
Jesus
warned us that
this stumbling
block would cause
Him to fight
against those that
succumb to the
practices and
tactics of Balaam
with the sword of
His mouth.
(Checkmate)
In
a recent article,
Christian
apologist Dr.
Michael Brown
provided an
accurate synopsis
of the situation:
If
Gordon College is
considering
revisiting its
morality
standards, the
school is
considering
exchanging the
favor of God for
the favor of man. [6]
Dr.
Brown continued in
his article:
To
D. Michael
Lindsay, the
gifted president
of Gordon, and to
the board of
trustees, I remind
you: Many eyes are
watching you,
knowing that the
decisions you make
could either
strengthen or
dishearten many
other schools that
will soon be put
under similar
pressure.
In
the sight of the
God that we serve
and love, I ask
you this crucial
question: If your
decision will
cause a ripple
effect across the
nation for other
Christian
colleges,
universities, and
seminaries, what
do you want that
effect to be?
Do
you want to send
the message across
America (and
beyond) that when
culture changes,
we capitulate to
culture? That a
practice expressly
forbidden by the
Bible and all
major forms of
Christianity
through the
centuries becomes
acceptable if
enough people sign
a petition? That
sufficient
pressure exerted
from some alumni
or students or
faculty can
overturn God's
Word? That
accreditation is
more important
than morality?
I
pray your message
will be that the
potential loss of
accreditation is a
small price to pay
for obedience to
God. [7]
I
agree with Dr.
Brown; loss of
governmental
accreditation is a
small price to pay
for obedience to
God.
If
Christian
education elects
to follow the path
of least
resistance and
yields to this
combination of
political and
social pressure,
not only will it
lose the favor of
God but will find
itself in God’s
crosshairs!
It
is time for all of
us to rethink
Christian
education,
especially for
those called to
ministry.
Should we
continue to demand
governmental
accreditation from
secular
associations that
have clearly
rejected both the
Bible and the God
it declares as
true?
The future
of the Church
might very well
depend upon our
answer.
Future
aspirants of the
ministry will need
to look beyond
their social
preconditioning
for the
governmental seal
of approval and
seek the face of
God to reveal the
proper school with
the biblical
integrity and
anointing to
empower them for
end-time ministry.
About
the Author
Dr.
Michael K. Lake is
the Chancellor and
Founder of Biblical
Life College and
Seminary.
He is a
contributing
author for the
best-selling book,
Blood
on the Altar:
The Coming
Christian Vs.
Christian War,
and the author of
the
soon-to-be-released
book, The Shinar Directive: Preparing
the Way for the
Son of Perdition.
Endnotes
[1]
Michael F.
Haverluck.
College
accreditation:
Please
God or please
man? One News
Now, October
3, 2014.
[5]
Strongs
#G4304.
Strong's
Enhanced
Lexicon.
BibleWorks for
Windows 7.0.
BibleWorks,
LLC, Norfolk,
VA.
Copyright ©
2006.
[6]
Michael Brown.
Gordon
College,
don’t sell
your soul for
secular
accreditation.
One
News Now,
October 3,
2014.